Why vaccines spread disease; an in-depth analysis of flawed vaccination science

   
(NaturalNews) Infectious diseases that the system insists have been mostly eradicated due to the advent of vaccines are starting to reemerge, with much of the blame for this being levied on the unvaccinated, who are automatically assumed to be the culprits. But a deeper look into the history of vaccines, how they work and what level of long-term protection they truly provide reveals that these golden calves of modern medicine are actually the vehicles through which infectious disease is being spread, with vaccinated individuals as the primary disease carriers.

It is the opposite of what we have all been told for decades about the nature of vaccines -- that they produce immunity to diseases that might otherwise kill you, is one common claim, as is the assumption that refusing vaccines leaves one prone to both catching and spreading otherwise uncommon infectious diseases. These and other modern medical myths about vaccines pervade mainstream thinking, and yet they have absolutely no basis in sound science.

In an extensive rebuttal to a 2012 article written by Forbes' Steven Salzberg that blamed a whooping cough outbreak in the Northwest on unvaccinated children, Dr. Paul G. King, Ph.D., of FAME Systems deconstructs the popular misconception that infectious disease reemergence is the result of people not getting vaccinated. On the contrary, it is the vaccination schedule itself, which the federal government has been coercing people into complying with for nearly the entire last century, that is ultimately leading to and driving these outbreaks.

"Salsberg is simply using a longstanding 'straw man' created long ago by his fellow vaccine apologists to divert the public's attention from the reality that... the current pertussis vaccines are neither effective in providing those inoculated with them long-term protection from contracting whooping cough nor... cost effective," explains Dr. King in his paper.

Vaccines as destroyers of natural immunity
One thing that few people, including many health professionals, fail to understand is that vaccines override the body's innate, or mucosal, immune system. Also known as non-specific immunity, innate immunity is our bodies' primary line of defense against all types of bacteria, toxins and other harmful invaders -- the gatekeeper, if you will, that protects the body's adaptive immune system from having to face these intruders directly.

Under ideal conditions, the innate immune system kicks into high gear at the first sign of a threat, blocking pathogens from getting past the nose, mouth, digestive tract or other bodily entry point. If for some reason the innate immune system fails at this task, the adaptive immune system picks up where it left off, adapting, as its name implies, to tackle the specific threat.

But this natural immune response is thwarted by vaccines, which intentionally bypass the innate immune system and go straight for the adaptive immune system. The resultant immune response is both unnatural and completely out of order, generating only temporary and often incomplete immunity as opposed to the lifelong immunity garnered from natural exposure.

"Whereas natural recovery from many infectious diseases usually stimulates lifetime immunity, vaccines only provide temporary protection and most vaccines require 'booster' doses to extend vaccine-induced artificial immunity," says Barbara Loe Fisher, president and co-founder of the National Vaccine Information Center.

The same is true for vaccines against pertussis, or whooping cough, which Dr. King, through his extensive research, found only provide a few years of limited protection as opposed to a lifetime of full protection in unvaccinated individuals who contract the disease naturally. The former have to continually get booster shots to maintain their immunity, while the latter are essentially immune for life after contracting the disease once.

"[A]t best, the current views are that the 'protection' provided by 'pertussis' vaccination lasts no more than 3 years in some percentage of those who are 'fully' vaccinated and initially protected," wrote Dr. King. "In the pre-vaccination era, having a case of whooping cough and recovering from it conservatively provided 10 to 50 years of protection from a re-infection that resulted in a clinical case of whooping cough caused by either B. pertussis or B. parapertussis."

In other words, unvaccinated individuals who contract mild whooping cough at a young age end up developing lifelong immunity to the disease without the need for a vaccine, and they also never become carriers of the disease. Vaccinated individuals, on the other hand, will never develop lifelong immunity, and will continually have to receive "booster" shots as protection, which the data shows is not always reliable or foolproof and can even lead to vaccine-induced health problems.

"Unlike the natural disease which appears to confer lifelong immunity, present day pertussis vaccines confer only partial and relative transient protection," wrote Drs. James W. Bass and Stephen R. Stephenson in a 1987 study entitled The return of pertussis. "A high degree of protection persists for 3 years, decreasing thereafter for 12 years after which little or no protection is evident."

Vaccines as carriers of disease
If subpar, temporary immunity was the only downside of getting vaccinated, it would be one thing. But the fact of the matter is that vaccinated individuals often end up becoming carriers of the diseases against which they were vaccinated, which is evident from decades of scientific data showing that the current vaccination schedule is directly responsible for bringing back all of these diseases that the media insists were eradicated by vaccines.

"[T]he current DTaP/Tdap vaccination program in the USA is increasing the percentages of cases of whooping cough that are either caused by B. parapertussis or, as some are beginning to claim, caused by mutated strains of B. pertussis that evade the protective effects of multiple time-displaced inoculations with the current DTaP/Tdap vaccines," explains Dr. King. "[V]accination with a 'pertussis component'-containing vaccine produces some low level of 'B. pertussis' carriers ['Pertussis Harrys'] who... can and do spread B. pertussis to others."

The recent whooping cough outbreaks in California, Washington, New York and elsewhere also serve as proof of this, as the vast majority of infected individuals in each of these cases had already been "fully" vaccinated for the disease. Not surprisingly, health authorities have been quiet about this inconvenient truth, leading the public to erroneously assume that the unvaccinated are responsible.

"[T]he reality is that more than 75% of the cases of whooping cough in outbreaks in Washington State since 2002 reportedly have been occurring in 'fully' vaccinated individuals, and this reality continues to be true in the 2012 'epidemic,'" adds Dr. King. "Further, the percentage in the current outbreaks that have a confirmed case of B. pertussis has not been disclosed -- nor is the percentage reported that have a confirmed case of B. parapertussis or another organism that can cause whooping cough."

For those already infected, Dr. King suggests supplementing with high doses of vitamin C, which he says eliminates the "whoop" and reduces the duration of the disease, as well as taking high doses of natural vitamin D3, which enables the body's immune system to produce site-specific antibiotics to target whooping cough organisms in the respiratory system while protecting gastrointestinal flora, which would otherwise be destroyed by synthetic antibiotics.

Be sure to check out Dr. King's full study on vaccines here:
http://dr-king.com.

Sources for this article include:

http://dr-king.com

http://dr-king.com

http://www.thelibertybeacon.com

http://science.naturalnews.com

http://science.naturalnews.com

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/044636_vaccine_myths_pertussis_whooping_cough.html#ixzz2yN6fxxAg
  

Disease, Vaccinations, and Lies

 

By Paul Fassa
Posted Thursday, September 19, 2013 at 03:38pm EDT
Keywords: adverse effects, disease, lies, Vaccinations, vaccine history

There are two peer pressure and official guilt trips used on parents who refuse vaccinations for their children. The first is absurd enough to be laughable. It’s the parental tactic of not letting children who weren’t vaccinated around their vaccinated children. Excuse me, if your kids were vaccinated, they’re immune, right?
Could be they’re not. As a matter of fact, children vaccinated with certain vaccines containing live viruses, such as the oral polio vaccine (OPV), have spread the live viruses through viral shedding to infect others with a virus that mutates and becomes worse.

And here’s the second guilt trip, impeding herd immunity by not getting their kids vaccinated. This is getting so bad that vaccine industry bought pompous politicians and other vaccine advocates are promoting legislative actions toward vaccine resisting parents.

The vaccine industry insists that their goal is to create herd immunity by vaccinating at least 90% of a given population. That’s a lot of vaccinating for a lot of Big Pharma revenue maker for sure.
Herd immunity depicts a scenario where everyone within that given population is immune to the disease vaccinated against. But vaccines don’t confer immunity, and they are dangerous.
A Few Recent Herd Immunity Unpublicized Breakouts

A 2012 study led by Dr. David Witt, an infectious disease specialist at the San Rafael, California Kaiser Permanente Medical Center concluded that pertussis, (whooping cough) occurs more among vaccinated children than children not vaccinated for pertussis. The DtaP pertussis vaccine currently used has the more dangerous DTP vaccine. Pertussis episodes have risen despite increased pertussis vaccinations.

The DTP (diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis) vaccine has had a very high infant mortality rate, too high to hide evidently. That’s why it was replaced with the DtaP vaccine for pertussis around 1996. Though not as often, brain inflammation still occurs from the DtaP vaccine, and it’s not effective for preventing pertussis.

In 2010, a mumps outbreak occurred among 1000 children in upper New Jersey and lower New York state. Almost 80% of them had been vaccinated with MMR (measles, mumps & rubella) vaccine.

Throughout the 1980s, official agencies reported several outbreaks of measles occurring among children who had been vaccinated in various locations including an Illinois junior high and high school, a Massachusetts high school, a region in France, and a rural area near Helisinki, Finland.

Both USA schools had over 90% vaccinated against measles. That’s the herd immunity mark for a given population. The bogus herd immunity claim serves to create more revenue while blaming parents who refuse vaccinations for endangering humanity.

Meanwhile, despite the fact that no more than five percent of vaccine adverse events get reported to the “voluntary” FDA’s vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS), there are many serious adverse events and vaccine injury deaths reported that aren’t publicized. Others adverse events seep through the cracks to vaccination concerned internet sites.

Brief Historical Summary of the Vaccination Fraud
You might be thinking hey, what about polio and smallpox? Wasn’t herd immunity created with vaccinations against those diseases? Several outspoken doctors, including Dr. Joseph Mercola, Dr. Russell Blaylock, and Dr. Suzanne Humphries, have graphically illustrated that those diseases were on the way out when the vaccines were introduced.

Apparently abundant food, improved sanitation, and good plumbing has had more to do with herd immunity than vaccinations.

Yet polio like paralysis events that continues to occur, especially among those vaccinated against polio. They are simply given different names now. They are actually vaccine adverse events from the vaccines that manifest with seizures and paralysis, very polio like but given very different names.

Though unreported by the mainstream media, many Pakistani, Indian, and African children are becoming paralyzed now from a campaign, supported largely by Bill Gates, to heavily dispense oral polio vaccines to third world countries.
The oral vaccine was so bad with its adverse effects and polio viral shedding that it was banned in the USA and a handful of other nations. But hey, let’s sell those those lots to UNICEF type agencies and Bill Gates to “contribute” to third world countries or bribe government officials to buy them directly. They’re overpopulated anyway. That’s not the type of industry to trust and support.

The concept of vaccinating with pathogenic material to immunize began in 1796, when British apothecary (pharmacist) Edward Jenner inserted cowpox pus under the skin of an eight year old boy. Jenner based his experiment on an unsubstantiated rumor that anyone who had experienced cowpox would be immune to smallpox.

Over the next couple of years, Jenner vaccinated others with cowpox to immunize them against smallpox. Without any actual proof of efficacy and safety, Jenner impressed mad-hatter King George III enough with a bogus immunization guarantee that he was awarded the equivalent of today’s half-million dollars.

Thus, Jenner was the first medical professional to administer diseased matter as medication to a healthy person and receive a substantial financial award. He was also the first to constantly denounce vaccination detractors successfully to protect both his large public purse and ego.

Today, vaccine developers create patents that enable them to receive royalties after they’ve been funded for their research. But many health professionals throughout the 19th Century knew that there had been several cases of smallpox among those with cowpox histories. So even Jenner’s premise was flawed.

England’s post vaccination incidents of smallpox rose steadily from five percent in the beginning to 95% by 1895. There was even a serious epidemic around 1872, one year after smallpox vaccinations were decreed mandatory in the UK. The mortality rate among smallpox victims also shot up five fold around that time.
Despite intelligent arguments with obvious facts and figures disproving efficacy and proving harm from toxic materials and viruses contained in vaccines, the inoculation for immunization mythology has been maintained since then.

The media has been complicit with the vaccine industry and Big Pharma by protecting the public from the truth and attacking reasonable dissenters viciously. Meanwhile the vaccine industry’s annual revenue has become $25 billion. MDs often receive bonuses for administering them while pediatricians are granted the sales rights to those they administer.

The pro-vaccination tactics of suppressing scientific data from concerned professionals has become more mafia like. Sincere medical professionals who register health concerns over vaccines are severely punished professionally and slandered, causing others to remain silent while children and adults are damaged from vaccinations.

Do your research online and don’t get duped by pro-vaccination propaganda and pressure for you or your children.

Sources for more information:
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/11/02/why-is-this-vaccine-causing-increased-infant-mortality.aspx
http://www.vaccinationcouncil.org
http://www.nvic.org/
http://vactruth.com/
http://www.drpauloffit.org/
http://www.naturalnews.com/033399_vaccines_measles.html
http://www.naturalnews.com/028142_mumps_vaccines.html

~ http://blogs.naturalnews.com/disease-vaccinations-and-lies/